Religion and money go hand in hand. Far from "spartan" conditions, or "vows of poverty" being implemented, we see palatial splendor. Firesnake looks at just why Australia seems to have an out of control monster, promising falsehoods and threatening eternal torment, funded by unwilling Australians. Indeed, we need only touch on a few - so called - "Christian" cons which are the tip of the iceberg.

There's also a comedy intro with explicit language. Just so you know...

A poll in Fairfax on April 27th 2008, suggests residents of the fair city to host the Vatican's Youth Love In are not as prayerfully considerate as promotional media grabs suggest. Writing in Crikey Bernard Keane noted, "... the majority of Sydney people had got jack of the Catholic Church’s World Youth Day once they realised how disruptive it would be. While the men who run the world’s premier institution of misogyny and paedophilia should never have been allowed to hold their medievalist frolic in public in the first place, the event has undoubtedly been affected by the Iemma Government’s Sadim touch".

In God's Business - BRW June 29-July 5, 2006 - Adele Ferguson spells out the extent of religious tax exemptions. In doing so, she also exposes how opaque this self-righteous business really is. The pointy bit is this. Religious groups receive exemptions on income tax, GST, FBT, payroll tax [non-commercial], stamp duty [all property transfers], rates and land tax. Nor do religious groups pay capital gains tax from asset sales, tax on commercial businesses or observe any Banking Act rules where they would apply. As Ferguson puts it, "better still" once exemptions are granted specific to financial services. "There is no sunset clause or review by APRA of it's operations".

Excluding donations, congregation and collection income, credit card machines or income from over 200 charities and additional business, the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, Uniting, Salvation Army, Baptist, Seventh Day Adventist and the Pentecostal churches produced a miraculous revenue of $23.3 billion in 2005. The Catholic Church reaped a whopping  40.3%.  Pentecostalism is growing faster than any religion in Australia, generating $263 million in 2004.

Pentecostalism claims around faith healing and supernaturalism are of significant concern. It represents the pinnacle of con artistry, non critical thought and unguarded conformity. It's cost to the community is beyond significant. Hillsong are the largest earner in this fastest growing religion. Hillsong Emerge is the benevolent "arm" of Hillsong Church, once illegally using funds intended for Indigenous communities, for it's own benefit.

Remember the disturbing link between Hillsong, Mercy Ministries, Gloria Jeans coffee shops, and medieval superstition? Sheer theft of money from vulnerable and disturbed Aussie girls who were then subject to exorcisms, bible classes and glossolalian ranting to cast out the demons that made them "evil" initially. The Age reported on this appalling abuse at the time.

However, we don't need to be demon exorcising, bible quoting devotees to coerce ill people for no reason other than vague superstition. As Ferguson noted, "Hospitals run by the Catholic Church, for example, will not conduct vasectomies, tubal ligation or abortions, although they are routine in other public hospitals". Max Wallace from ANU says: “People in many parts of Australia are discriminated against by not having an alternative hospital provider.” [Page. 44] Sisters of Charity simply refuse to reveal revenue. And on the pattern goes.

Of interest is that an April 23rd shin dig put on as a "gee thanks" by Cardinal Pell for former PM John Howard, included CEO of World Youth Day, Roy Wakelin-King on the 'confidential' guest list. Held at Pell's Pad - Cathedral House - in St Mary's Cathedral precinct in College Street, it was rumoured Kevin Rudd would drop in "for a chat". Pell who lunges forward with "Be Not Afraid" as his motto is the man who smoothed things over for a resolution to this silly business of the Roman Catholic Church paying for self indulgence.

To satisfy the Jockeys Club for any manner of potential deficits from Pious partying at Randwick, Pell scooped $42 million from Howard. For the gig itself our Chief Magician appointee from Castle Vaticanus scored another $35 million. Remember this is his buddy who handed him $4 million for a Sydney campus at Notre Dame Uni. On the eve of the 2004 election. Leaked to Sunday papers, read just before the pews fill.

The really strange thing is even when we know the ultimate terminus of where this train takes us, we fail to do the responsible thing. Category 12 funding is available via the Education Department Funding Scheme for "the poorest schools in the lowest-income communities in the country", according to one of the scheme's architect's Jim McMorrow. "They were meant to be very, very poor, with very, very low income, and largish average class sizes," he said, according to Fairfax papers.

Despite the sect itself boasting of being "in the upper levels of the socio-economic group", The Exclusive Brethren's already notably wealthy schools continue to receive the "special" funding. A Brethren spokeswoman claims the payments were initiated under the Keating government.

Of significant concern is the decision by the Rudd government to hand over $50 million in coming years. This is despite the schools failing to meet criteria noted above. Below are schools funded via Category 12 Special needs over 2001 - 04.

• Kulkarriya Community School, Fitzroy Crossing, WA
• The Alice Springs Steiner School, Alice Springs, NT
• Nyangatjatjara College, Yulara, NT
• Bellhaven Special School, Young, NSW
• Mansfield Autistic Centre, Mansfield, VIC
• St Gabriel's School for Hearing Impaired Children, Castle Hill, NSW
• Melrose Park School, St Marys, South Australia [$$$]
• MET School, Sydney, NSW [$$$]

   [$$$] - Brethren Schools.

The Age continued;

Education Department documents also reveal that the Exclusive Brethren regarded former prime minister John Howard as their most influential supporter and ally of last resort. In 2000, the sect's elders asked Mr Howard for special assistance on school funding because of his "sympathetic support in the past and the contact with you over the years".

Federal school funding documents show that the Brethren's multi-campus NSW school, Meadowbank, and the South Australian school, Melrose Park, were funded at the same rate as "special schools", giving them the same per-student funding as Nyangatjatjara College, in the Northern Territory, the Giant Steps school for autistic students and schools for the hearing-impaired.

The Brethren's MET school in Meadowbank does not meet the criteria for category 12 funding: it is in suburban Sydney, has small class sizes, and is financially supported by a community that boasts it has no poverty. The sect's Victorian school, Glenvale, which has campuses at Glenroy, Lilydale and Melton, receives a lower rate of funding. [Source]

Other more benign disparities include the YMCA securing Recreation Centre contracts, not due to service quality, but due to tax breaks. With the above financial favour, the YMCA simply undercut non religious commercial entities, involved in the bidding for tendered contracts.

In true religio-centric character the YMCA is one of a very few organisations to ignore qualifications and experience staff bring to public health and recreation needs. Pay, for example, is in the lowest income bracket for staff who have a fitness hobby certificate and those with science degrees and years of clinical experience.

When we pay for "extra" services it's a mere marketing strategy we respond to. Ditto referrals from physiotherapists to community recreation centres. We have no idea if the individual provider at the YMCA is a professionally trained therapist or someone earning a few part time dollars. An identical national uniform serves to depersonalise the individual and add weight to the "team loyalty" con.

Occasionally, this blinds the staff themselves. Many become convinced such poor income is "a necessary part of the job", focusing on free use of facilities and "community contribution" as their noble career path. Coerced philanthropy, perhaps?

Join and we must pay by monthly or fortnightly direct debit. Stop attending and we alone must stop the debiting. In most cases it's the attrition of members that finances the centres. Fee paying members who don't attend always outnumber those who do. But that's fine as it is the accepted model in the health and fitness industry. Guilt and well meaning plans to "get fit" will ensure we do not cancel paying until long after we've stopped attending. And there's always the disincentive to stop paying in the huge joining fee we're continually reminded about.

In fact, the YMCA go after profit like a struggling business. In an age of diseases related to lack of exercise, one may wonder why this Christian group is not feeling too charitable - despite massive financial help.

A global organisation, the YMCA to probably afford to run our centres at no loss, as a favour to a sports keen nation. But such financial realities apply to all religious affiliates - great and small. It's always been about the money. Nothing but the money. Staff, clients and the Great Aussie Fair Go are used or abused to advantage in keeping ahead, as it were.

For a mere fraction of the above, religions in Australia, Pell, Baptists, Brethren Elders, Cults, Catholics, business savvy Seventh Day Adventists, "Drug Free" Scientologists/Evangelists, Harley riding con artists, Christian City, Teen Challenge, greed focused magic working Pentecostals - and more - have much to smile about. This of course, is only topped by the rise of fundamentalism in all it's lethal malignant glory.

And still, we keep on paying...

All articles touched on and other posts are here.
Music thanks to Garageband.

NB: Explicit Language at beginning.

The YouTube URL of George Calin's act is;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o

Gags.
31 min.
14 MB.

The Medical Journal of Australia recently published a paper entitled, Unplanned admissions to two Sydney public hospitals after naltrexone implants. The conclusion relating to the use of implants in blocking opioid receptors thus the effect of opiates such as heroin, in treating addiction, was straight forward:

An editorial critical of the TGA's failure to monitor the outcome of what is essentially exploitation of the Special Access Scheme was published in the same issue. The scheme is designed to allow access to medication not otherwise available for terminally ill patients. The medication must have a proven unique ability to manage the symptoms in question. This is not the case for naltrexone implants which are being used in unregulated settings as an alternative to other - proven - treatments for opiate addiction. Indeed, it is this legal loophole via the TGA that acts as a deterrent for naltrexone proponents to report adverse reactions. From ABC's The Health Report April 21st, 2008:

A co-authour of the editorial commented. "It is concerning that the recent research on naltrexone implants in Australia has not followed usual scientific processes," Associate Professor Robert Ali, Director of the Drug and Alcohol Services Council in Adelaide, said.

Reminiscent of Gibson, Degenhart and Hall's paper Opioid overdose deaths can occur in patients with naltrexone implants [MJA, 2007; 186: 152-153], this latest data caused similar responses and academic discussion over methodology. The responses to Gibson et al are interesting and indicate how difficult an area to clarify this is. Simply put, how does one die and what role - if any - does naltrexone play? I'd point out the following;

• If someone died "from" the implant it would require a scenario in which reasons for IC admission went untreated: renal failure, dehydration, metabolic acidosis.If someone dies from opiate toxicity due to a faulty implant, it heralds poor technology and monitoring. Eg; it's a two month wait for blood level test results in Perth, poor technique: insertion may be incomplete [not all tablets successfully inserted].

• If someone dies from opiate toxicity after cessation of treatment, then it raises questions about the treatment in total, and suggests poor follow up or ineffective counseling. Reasons for using are not addressed in full by blocking cravings.

• If someone dies from opiate toxicity with an active implant, and toxicology reveals other CNS depressants, it may go unrecorded as poly-drug toxicity can be argued as COD.

• Finally, if someone dies of obvious opiate toxicity, in circumstances familiar to emergency services, there is no reason to then confirm if an implant is active, faulty or inserted in the first place. The COD would be opiate toxicity and variables related to the implant not recorded.

Hence, anecdotally there is some confusion regarding "deaths from naltrexone treatment", as it is often noted.

However this paper did not deal with deaths - only admissions. And symptoms were quite severe, including metabolic acidosis, renal failure, dehydration, prolonged and profound withdrawal symptoms, vomiting, diarrhoea, confusion, delirium etc with some requiring Intensive Care. We can see from above we're talking about the failings of the implant, hygiene, monitoring and perhaps poor methodology in calculating naltrexone dose. It's done via Body Mass Index. Yet it may well be ambitious to think body size equates strictly to neurophysiology and genetic predisposition to neuropharmacodynamics - how drugs effect the individuals brain.

Nonetheless as with all things involving naltrexone, the opportunity to observe abstinence proponents defend an ideology, in the face of evidence, presents itself. Close, chronological examination of one vocal proponent, in light of ongoing problems and previous fatalities is cause for concern. Dr. Albert Stuart Reece has been the focus of attention in the humble Firesnake Holeplex before. On this occasion another response to the denial of evidence relating to naltrexone implants. He offers no evidence - just promises. In looking for reasons why Reece may ignore contrary evidence one finds the theme of fundamental conservative morality. It's as if Reece wants to excise "immoral" Harm Minimisation and implant morality...

In this episode, Firesnake looks at the rebuttal from Drug Free Australia to the MJA findings. Australia could be the biggest loser. You can read the response here. There's an extensive reply at the Drug Free Australia Watch blog. Citing "important contemporary evidence" and quoting Dr. George O'Neil and Dr. Stuart Reece in support of the W.A. implant trials, we are promised upcoming positive data in "the world's leading medical journals". It has actually been submitted for review and it remains to be seen as "a truly significant achievement", as Dr. Reece claims.

In fact Reece has promised these "radically superb", "brilliant" implants are the "best in the world" and "statistically powerful results" will follow. However, he said that 15 months ago in his submission to the Inquiry on the Limits of Harm Minimisation. "The outcomes of this trial are already very obvious. They will be brilliant, and in addiction medicine, as radically superb as the HPV vaccine has proven in infectious disease control in that discipline", he said in his Parliamentary Submission. Methadone itself came in for particularly vicious and unfounded criticism. Whilst Reece is prone to claim the presence of drugs other than opiates causes overdoses in naltrexone patients - when the implant fails - he's also prone to claim the opposite applies to methadone. He reasoned that 78 methadone related deaths were really 851 because the presence of other drugs meant "the figure should be clarified". [Page 5]. Or rather, dismissed.

"Therefore the problem is not one of evidence or safety assurances - those determinations have already been made by the many reputable and highly skilled clinicians who have used the devices, invariably with superb results". [Pages. 14-15]  How is progress going? Well, despite DFA's claims, Norman Swan noted on April 21st, 2008;

Firesnake has taken interest in the moral conservatism of the religious right and it's propensity toward abstinence. It's argued that fundamental religious beliefs can have an adverse effect in the public health domain in the quest to enforce morality over evidence. It's further argued the global involvement of certain naltrexone proponents in anti HM propaganda is well demonstrated and this conflict of interest makes for poor integrity and objectivity from DFA and their "fellows". Drug Free Australia don't so much present evidence on Harm Prevention successes, as present attacks on Harm Minimisation as the self evident cause of our drug problem. Attacking the signifiers of Harm Minimisation as malignant is done over and again, rather than promote the socially unpopular strict conservative moralism, that is the assumed alternative. We follow the loyal devotion to abstinence of Dr. Stuart Reece from 1990 quotes beloved by the International Abstinence Association on the moral decline of society [bold mine];

Enduring the "hedonistic delirium" of modern democracies, Reece threatened the QLD government, claiming they'd "have blood on their hands" if he couldn't prescribe naltrexone - September, 1999. He got his way. By the last week of May 2001, 25 patients were dead and the QLD medical tribunal launched an inquiry into "gross negligence", also noting his breaching guidelines regarding pregnancy.

From ABC The 7:30 Report - 4 June 2001:

ANNE REYNOLDS: He was very, very passionate. He was very enthusiastic about his program. He was very adamant that it was The best thing available, nothing else was as good as Naltrexone.
SIMON ROYAL: Anne claims Naltrexone treatment left her son with chronic depression and a new addiction to antidepressants.

Six hundred days after his course of Naltrexone tablets, Paul Reynolds took heroin again.
It killed him. Anne is flying back to London after interring her son's ashes.

ANNE REYNOLDS: He's doing it without the right - enough support.
He's sending them back into the world with just the families to care for them without the rehabilitation process in place. He seems to think that he has all the answers and he doesn't. He's one man. [Source].

He was defended by Dr. David Hunt who, claimed the death rate was similar to methadone. But a 2005 study at NDARC noted over 2000 - 2003 naltrexone had a death rate associated with it, four times that of methadone [Page 49]. Hunt, along with Reece and O'Neil, appears in a thank-you list in the anti methadone, pro naltrexone, pro "bible classes" Trophy of Grace. Written by Bronwyn Healy who now holds a place on Youth for a Drug Free Australia.

Total Mortality per 1000 Episodes, 2000 - 2003 [Source]:
Methadone: 102,615 treated. 282 related deaths. Total Mortality = 2.7
Naltrexone: 3,169 treated. 32 related deaths. Total Mortality = 10.1

Two years later the Inquiry was indefinitely adjourned, Reece had hurt feelings and claimed "vindication" from a "conspiracy between drug addicts and The Courier Mail". Three months later on September 14 2003, he was on Sunday Nights with the ABC, claiming Dr. God was the one in control and that "faith cures addiction". Remember, it's not what one believes we're noting. It's what one does with it.

In Februrary 2007 Dr. Reece introduced himself to the Inquiry into the impact of illict drug use on families. He glossed over his tragic past with naltrexone;

At least 25 dead and 1,800 rapid detoxes - each taking days and requiring intensive medical support - in eight years. And he "knows the science"? Asked about naltrexone fatalities;

On August 7th 2007 Reece wrote to the Commissioner of Health in New Jersey, USA, lobbying against needle exchange programmes and also painted his experience with naltrexone as authoritative and positive. He also again attacked Wodak;

We also note the support of certain overlapping elements of the religious right in Australia. Firesnake looks closely at this approach toward addiction "treatment" and asks just where the morality lies. How is it "morally correct" as some supporters claim, to place ones superstitions ahead of another's health in making clinical choices?

It seems plain that ideology is what defines policy and procedure for certain practitioners. At some point we must ask ourselves which dynamic is really dominating here? The health of the individual or the cosmic duty of the practioner to expunge the aforementioned off-shoots of progressive societies "hedonistic delirium"? And ensure society finds "the way back" as the way forward solution to modern day problems? I must submit dear reader, that the latter is plainly demonstrated. When the gains of democratic society are so insouciantly insulted, we may conclude the signifiers of Harm Minimisation must terrify the morally conservative and appear as invitations to debauchery.

More so, it is also plain identities associated objectively with Harm Minimisation, are justly discredited in spectacular evidence vacuums, by dent of their professional leanings. Naltrexone is the emergency adjunct to faith based education and general "just say no" abstinence, employed when they fail. Evidence to the contrary is simply ignored as is the option of respecting the best of both approaches.

The conflict of interest here is clear. Faith and superstitious belief cannot be allowed to intercede in the treatment of vulnerable at risk community members. When we consider also what certain proponent will gain from "success" and lose from failure, we must remain highly skeptical. The last word should go to Professor John Saunders who said in 2001 referring to the Reece deaths;

The first tragedy is that now a large number of young people have reportedly died having had treatment with Naltrexone.
The other tragedy is that the adverse publicity that Naltrexone has received recently will prevent there being a proper research and development program into Naltrexone treatment, including Naltrexone implants. I have a real concern that a useful, the availability of a useful form of treatment, will actually be compromised by all the drama which is occurring at the moment.

All articles mentioned in the episode are here.

Music thanks to Garageband.

Gags.
1 hour. 3 min.
25 MB.