Sat, 29 November 2008 ![]() In August Firesnake looked at the June 2008, 8th Session of the UN Human Rights Council and the evident clash between freedom of expression and freedom of religion. It followed - indeed required - the council adoption of a resolution to effectively modify the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Freedom of Expression. David Littman was challenged with 16 Points of Order from Egyptian delegate Amr Roshdy Hassan, Iran and Pakistan.
The mandate now includes a requirement to report on abuse of that right, as well as violations. Violations reference harmful disregard and a breach of that right. The "abuse" is not related to "violation" but to misapplication, perversive, inappropriate and excessive authoritarian abuse of the right to speak freely. In the present global environment, and certainly with respect to history it is plain Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - the UDHR - would clash, and do so favouring religious "freedom". Violation of the freedom to express oneself is objective, qualified and quantifiable. Abuse reported through subjective claims of offence taken, when demonstrably false or culturally specific superstition is the claimed "target" or "victim", is harder to define, thus dismiss. Such cases may contain more material designed to explain why, rather than complain that, a religious freedom has been suppressed. The right to plainly say that this situation is redefining and rubber stamping all behaviour supposedly related to a particularly strong opinion - or belief - and will certainly nurture archaic, misogynistic and inhumane criminality is vital. This has been lost. More so, the devout of any belief system, suffering under the dominance of an elite, have lost a defensive voice. The slow morphing of god's will into one that crushes women and children whilst sanctioning blatant, violent criminality in men, can continue on it's holy way. Simply put, objective, accurate abuse of human beings comes second to novel, malignant or ambiguous "insults" to religious freedom. Including 'freedom' of intellectual subjectivity. This doesn't mean any problems may be levelled at the articles within the UDHR, but suggests that Article 30, the final article, should be reconsidered seriously in resolving what is rapidly becomming a struggle and cause for angst: Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein. The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification to any of the articles of this Declaration.
As a crucial part of the International Bill of Human Rights, the UDHR accompanies the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; ICCPR and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; ICESCR. Firesnake has touched on the latter quite often in revealing Swedish "drug free-zero tolerance" policies as abusive and, as that Special Rapporteur noted, in breach of the international right to health. The two covenants provide the option to address issues within the UDHR and are referenced or used as tools in discourse and debate in a variety of arenas. The International Humanist and Ethical Union - the IHEU - note the two day seminar in October [2] to examine articles 19 and 20 of the ICCPR during which over 200 national delegates and NGO's submitted written statements. The Geneva seminar had the subheading; Freedom of expression and advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence. Entered into force in 1973 the covenant was not ratified by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia who aren't bound by it. Muslims globally do not embrace this decision, many dismissing the influence of the OIC and some have made this plain. At the 9th session IHEU main representative Roy W Brown presented a statement to the council, challenging the notion of Islamaphobia as the negative it was portrayed as, which drew a point of order from Egyptian delegate Amr Rosdy Hassan. We let Amr have his say. We also visit the Organisation of the Islamic Conference [OIC] website, have a quick review and a look at an Islamophobia Monthly Bulletin, from October this year. In the midst of all this we consider the crucial aspect of discerning between xenophobia, caution, human rights and prioritising where our concerns may fall. It's important to not forget the struggle against Islamic suppression has gone on for centuries. Only recently, has it become a force against our way of life, as well as the continual control of the lives of millions which has always been resisted. Here too, as is plain in the Islamophobia bulletin, we cannot generalise. Those who promote, support and tolerate Sharia come from diverse lifestyles. With all this going on it's easy to miss other events related to ongoing abuses under Sharia. Around 2000, Sharia Law had clearly began to be imposed in Nigeria's Northern states, with Zamfara a key hub of support, openly snubbing the government's secular legal system. At the time the simple fact is Nigeria had Christians, Igbo People practicing Odiani, followers of Yoruba who worshiped that deities manifestation of Orisha, via the Ifá divination method and Muslims. Even today Sharia is not supported in Southern or South Eastern areas, whilst Northern Christians are legally bound by Sharia. A welcome sign identifies Zamfara as the home of Sharia. Christian females wear a unique head scarf and must take compulsory Koranic lessons. Separate taxis and buses transport women and a growing generation of confused oppressed and suppressed girls. From the town of Zamfara in Northern Nigeria, Governor Sani reminded us in 2000 of the importance of entering a toilet with the left leg, exiting with the right, thanking Allah for banishment of such evil and the benefit of beheading dissenters. The BBC reported in 2002: Mr Sani, considered to be one of the architects of the new strict laws, says the Nigerian constitution specifically allows for the implementation of Islamic law. "Islam is a faith, a belief - it is only those who believe in that faith that will either determine something is wrong or something is right," he said. "We should all allow each other to practice our religion the way it is in our holy books."
Saudi Arabia is his role model, and a generation of women have had their lives cropped short. Again we see the familiar theme of men favoured socially, legally and domestically to the point of absurdity and women assumed to be quite simply guilty of the perpetual crime of being female. War Against Women is a predictably damning comment on the use of this new global trend of rag-tag Sharia used to control a semi-terrified populace. In what is truly a malignant meme, the concept of interpreting scripture to use medieval justice as social control continues to astonish with individual mutations. As noted here before, Islamically speaking, many Jihadists are bound for hellfire via the act of indiscriminate killing of Muslims. Securing a notable "only apology" from the recently executed "Bali Bombers", such a crime against Islam is not well accepted by traditional and many radical clerics. Similarly, forcing Muslims to forgo all modern or Western influence as a means to spread The Ummah is ignorant of the cultural achievements of Islam, much less the grief devout Muslims feel about that loss. This is compounded by opportunists nurtured and raised in "infidel" nations - a far cry from poverty, war or an Egyptian jail cell. Yet presently the de-radicalisation voice from Mu'man Bin Othman, Sayid Imam [Dr. Fadl] and others is small compared to the global orchestration of recruitment of alienated young men. If one thing can be said of Sadi it is that he shrewdly imposed Sharia, taking advantage of the crime rate, prodding the deeply spiritual nature of Nigerians and exploiting the propensity to bond in a loosely organised male population. Also he is skilled in corrupt circles. A penchant for scooping a large percentage from major infrastructure contracts had made him a powerful man. This was a guy who manipulated his environment, understood his people, used fear and doled out inducements. Far from the radical and explosive scenes noted elsewhere, Sharia has been almost clinical in it's rise in Zamfara. Nonetheless, many now live in fear and those who benefit are in that almost intractable position of being asked to relinquish power, wealth and ultimately face actual justice - not Jihadist 'justice'. Whilst a rising crime wave shrank with the guarantee of losing a limb and the sight of stoning, lashings, severe jailing, mutilation, decapitation and enforced indoctrination, present Sharia in Nigeria isn't government sanctified. About Africa Action list an extensive list from Amnesty, now almost seven years old, in which Amnesty single out notable cases. Cases which Aussie skeptics had heard of just recently. Nigerian Skeptic Leo Igwe wrote in The Skeptic, Sharia and Human Rights in Nigeria - Vol 28, No 1: Autumn of 2008, pp. 55-56. He covered the unique case of charges brought against a well known social critic for a play he'd written criticising the double standards of Sharia in the North of Nigeria. His coverage of human rights abuses and history of Sharia in Nigeria is excellent. We look further at the 1,000 year history of Sharia, culminating in expansion following Uthman Dan Fodio's 1804 jihad, and political maneuvering last, and this century. Original Deputy Governor of Zamfara, Aliyu Shinkafi, has risen to dominate and has also boosted the glowing image of Sharia Success. The history of Sharia finding it's way to Nigeria is - as in many parts of the globe - bound to culture, commerce and politics. Today, amidst the background rumble of serious concern a typical African head-in-the-sand article may be found praising Sharia, Zamfara and today's Governor, Aliya Shinkafi. The Daily Independent wrote on November 10th 2008, in Nigeria: Sharia for Peace and Sanity - Shinkafi, that concerns were severely misplaced. People were safe, life was good and "a critical review" revealed the role of the media in painting Sharia law as more strict than it was. In fact, readers were told: Men are permitted to booze with their babes though it was not confirmed whether the place enjoys preferential treatment because of the caliber and brand of people that unwind there daily. Assorted music and drinks are available between 7p.m. and 10p.m. daily. Shinkafi addressed the media saying, "Introduction of Sharia Law is all an attempt to sanitize the society. God told us to work hard. There is no provision for gambling, adultery, alcoholism, drug trafficking, cheating in trade among others. If you reduce all these, you have reduced crime and corruption rates drastically. The traders and farmers will spend their money judiciously."
God indeed works in mysterious ways. Access to articles here. Music thanks to Garageband Gags, 55.49 19.2 MB Comments[0] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mon, 8 September 2008 ![]() As the USA heads toward another election the virtual enslavement of candidates to "the religious problem" is frankly disturbing. Yet whilst we associate "Christian Fundamentalism" with the religious right the issue isn't quite so simple. "Fundamentalism" and the "Religious Right" are not the same creature and it's wise to be certain of where threats to democratic values arise on "home soil". "I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved -- the Cross.
Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!" -- John Adams, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson.
- Source: The Chosen Nation: The Influence of Religion on U.S. Foreign Policy. John B. Judis [page 3]. Some quotes supporting the 'christian heritage' of the Founding Fathers: "Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise, every expanded prospect." ". . . no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities." "Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." "As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of morals and his religion, as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw or is likely to see, but I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes, and I have, with most of the present dissenters in England, some doubts as to his divinity, though it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an opportunity of knowing the truth with less trouble. I see no harm, however, in its being believed, if that belief has the good consequences, as probably it has, of making his doctrines more respected and observed, especially as I do not perceive that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the unbelievers in his government of the world with any peculiar marks of his displeasure." All references touched on are here. Comments[0] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sun, 31 August 2008 ![]() Al-Qaeda has come under criticism from noted jihadist prosecutors and thinkers within Islam itself. The indiscriminate killing of Muslims has drawn vocal contempt from Bin Ladens "battlefield comrade", Mu'man Bin Othman. He joins a growing list of noted radical clerics and revered jihadi authors to attack what is an inescapable religious hypocrisy, within al-Qaedas strategy. Oh, you young people, do not be deceived by the heroes of the internet, the leaders of the microphones, who are launching statements inciting the youth while living under the protection of intelligence services, or of a tribe, or in a distant cave or under political asylum in an infidel country. They have thrown many others before you into the infernos, graves, and prisons. Those who have triggered clashes and pressed their brothers into unequal military confrontations - are specialists neither in fatwas nor in military affairs. [BBC]
I said to him, we want to give you what you need, not what you want. You need to re-examine your ideology and you need someone to advise you. Why should I believe I have a duty to support al-Qaeda? How, Islamically, did they establish their authority?
British historian Hilaire Belloc’s “The Great Heresies” written in 1938: It has always seemed to me possible, and even probable, that there would be a resurrection of Islam and that our sons or our grandsons would see the renewal of that tremendous struggle between the Christian culture and what has been for more than a thousand years its greatest opponent. The suggestion that Islam may re-arise sounds fantastic, but this is only because men are always powerfully affected by the immediate past. One might say that they are blinded by it. But not so very long ago, less than a hundred years before the Declaration of Independence, Vienna was almost taken and only saved by the Christian army under the command of the King of Poland, on a date that ought to be among the most famous in history: September 11, 1683. Less than four years later on April 2nd 1942, and relatively close to where Belloc wrote, Ken Bigley was born in Liverpool, England.
All articles mentioned are here. Comments[0] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thu, 21 August 2008 ![]() Sharia Law has won a victory over human rights within the UN Human Rights Council, and sanctioned by the same council. In fairness to President Doru Romulus Costea, he asked that it be recorded he'd never been in a more uncomfortable situation - including when his own statements as Council President were "challenged point blank".
The debacle in the UN HR Council stands yet again as another fabulous advance for The Ummah as the earth moves slowly but surely to one rule under one true God - Allah. An admirable and well won victory for Diplomatic Jihad. Our War on Terror is as useful to understanding the theological, political, social and military issues driving conflict as is Black Death to mapping the Yersinia pestis bacteria genome, in an attempt to arrest the spread of plague. As always, it is the gullibility in the West that will see Islam one day rule our planet. The old, tired and dusty standards were present. Misunderstanding over freedom, justice and peace. 1. Acts of worship (al-ibadat), which includes:
Ritual Purification (Wudu), Prayers (Salah), Fasts (Sawm and Ramadan), Charity (Zakat), Pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj). Financial transactions, Endowments , Laws of inheritance, Marriage, divorce, and child care, Food and drink (including ritual slaughtering and hunting), Penal punishments, War and peace, Judicial matters (including witnesses and forms of evidence). Allah wants the world, "desires for you" paradise and if you can't see how darn simple this is you will die. If you're too stupid to live a pious life then die as you kill for Allah - and it's an X rated paradise for your trouble. For a psychotic warlord in the habit of consummating marriages with nine year old girls - why 9 is the legal marriage age under Sharia - who needed an army to travel and kill with a guarantee of loyalty, it's an ideal formula. In the 21st century it gives us terrorism urged by Extreme Islamic Clerics. Motivation for Jihad is fundamental interpretation of the prophets strategic mind control and "revelations". Genital mutilation, decapitation, amputation of opposite feet and hands, eye plucking to extract information [torture] and so much more is the "emulation" of the prophet. The Borg would be proud of such hive mentality, and I hope you can see the purpose of rubbish such as this website. It's claimed the prophet "Ascended" into heaven, making his senior followers outright liars who then inherited his military state, ensuring the opportunistic genocidal "explosion" of Islam we see in history. So, then. Remembering everyday people get caught up in drug related crime what of drug users under Sharia? Harm Reduction is documented as reducing HIV spread among Iranian prisoners, something the Iranian regime may have to acknowledge. Some Sharia may be open to interpretation. Allah changed his mind when the prophet realised no-one liked him much around the year 615-20. So, he found out God actually wanted lots of blood - not social cooperation and equality of worship, as is mirrored from earlier Koranic verses in Mecca - before the Islamic calendar begins in Medina 12 years later. This concept of abrogation did away with the benign verses seen in other "religions". As the Koran is published from longest to shortest chapters, chronology is confusing - and this is exploited by Islamic apologists. Clarification of Koranic messages is gained from consulting the over 100 volumes of Hadiths - chronicling the prophets life. Much like no-one who ever laid eyes on Jesus ever wrote about him, the Hadiths were also began many years after the prophets death, by interfering apologists using notations supposedly gathered during his life. Hadiths supporting care of "the oppressed" exist and are discussed as essential to Islam today. As is the more important personal ideal of inner Jihad: struggle. Open and firm discourse is needed for all minority groups in Islam and for those under influence of the Official Islamic Council. Presently in the Middle East the socio-political climate favours an unacceptable humanitarian crisis due to the escalating influx of illicit drugs, and arguably further capital punishment. Despite the scale, despite claims of UN bodies, resolutions, promises and human rights, the level of open and honest discourse within multicultural communities is approximately zero. Perhaps in the first instance the greatest hurdle is not one of malignancy, but of widespread misunderstanding. All articles touched on are here. Comments[0] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mon, 26 May 2008 ![]() Religion and money go hand in hand. Far from "spartan" conditions, or "vows of poverty" being implemented, we see palatial splendor. Firesnake looks at just why Australia seems to have an out of control monster, promising falsehoods and threatening eternal torment, funded by unwilling Australians. Indeed, we need only touch on a few - so called - "Christian" cons which are the tip of the iceberg. In God's Business - BRW June 29-July 5, 2006 - Adele Ferguson spells out the extent of religious tax exemptions. In doing so, she also exposes how opaque this self-righteous business really is. The pointy bit is this. Religious groups receive exemptions on income tax, GST, FBT, payroll tax [non-commercial], stamp duty [all property transfers], rates and land tax. Nor do religious groups pay capital gains tax from asset sales, tax on commercial businesses or observe any Banking Act rules where they would apply. As Ferguson puts it, "better still" once exemptions are granted specific to financial services. "There is no sunset clause or review by APRA of it's operations". Excluding donations, congregation and collection income, credit card machines or income from over 200 charities and additional business, the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, Uniting, Salvation Army, Baptist, Seventh Day Adventist and the Pentecostal churches produced a miraculous revenue of $23.3 billion in 2005. The Catholic Church reaped a whopping 40.3%. Pentecostalism is growing faster than any religion in Australia, generating $263 million in 2004.
Pentecostalism claims around faith healing and supernaturalism are of significant concern. It represents the pinnacle of con artistry, non critical thought and unguarded conformity. It's cost to the community is beyond significant. Hillsong are the largest earner in this fastest growing religion. Hillsong Emerge is the benevolent "arm" of Hillsong Church, once illegally using funds intended for Indigenous communities, for it's own benefit. Remember the disturbing link between Hillsong, Mercy Ministries, Gloria Jeans coffee shops, and medieval superstition? Sheer theft of money from vulnerable and disturbed Aussie girls who were then subject to exorcisms, bible classes and glossolalian ranting to cast out the demons that made them "evil" initially. The Age reported on this appalling abuse at the time. However, we don't need to be demon exorcising, bible quoting devotees to coerce ill people for no reason other than vague superstition. As Ferguson noted, "Hospitals run by the Catholic Church, for example, will not conduct vasectomies, tubal ligation or abortions, although they are routine in other public hospitals". Max Wallace from ANU says: “People in many parts of Australia are discriminated against by not having an alternative hospital provider.” [Page. 44] Sisters of Charity simply refuse to reveal revenue. And on the pattern goes. Of interest is that an April 23rd shin dig put on as a "gee thanks" by Cardinal Pell for former PM John Howard, included CEO of World Youth Day, Roy Wakelin-King on the 'confidential' guest list. Held at Pell's Pad - Cathedral House - in St Mary's Cathedral precinct in College Street, it was rumoured Kevin Rudd would drop in "for a chat". Pell who lunges forward with "Be Not Afraid" as his motto is the man who smoothed things over for a resolution to this silly business of the Roman Catholic Church paying for self indulgence. To satisfy the Jockeys Club for any manner of potential deficits from Pious partying at Randwick, Pell scooped $42 million from Howard. For the gig itself our Chief Magician appointee from Castle Vaticanus scored another $35 million. Remember this is his buddy who handed him $4 million for a Sydney campus at Notre Dame Uni. On the eve of the 2004 election. Leaked to Sunday papers, read just before the pews fill. The really strange thing is even when we know the ultimate terminus of where this train takes us, we fail to do the responsible thing. Category 12 funding is available via the Education Department Funding Scheme for "the poorest schools in the lowest-income communities in the country", according to one of the scheme's architect's Jim McMorrow. "They were meant to be very, very poor, with very, very low income, and largish average class sizes," he said, according to Fairfax papers. Despite the sect itself boasting of being "in the upper levels of the socio-economic group", The Exclusive Brethren's already notably wealthy schools continue to receive the "special" funding. A Brethren spokeswoman claims the payments were initiated under the Keating government. Of significant concern is the decision by the Rudd government to hand over $50 million in coming years. This is despite the schools failing to meet criteria noted above. Below are schools funded via Category 12 Special needs over 2001 - 04.
The Age continued; Education Department documents also reveal that the Exclusive Brethren regarded former prime minister John Howard as their most influential supporter and ally of last resort. In 2000, the sect's elders asked Mr Howard for special assistance on school funding because of his "sympathetic support in the past and the contact with you over the years". Federal school funding documents show that the Brethren's multi-campus NSW school, Meadowbank, and the South Australian school, Melrose Park, were funded at the same rate as "special schools", giving them the same per-student funding as Nyangatjatjara College, in the Northern Territory, the Giant Steps school for autistic students and schools for the hearing-impaired. The Brethren's MET school in Meadowbank does not meet the criteria for category 12 funding: it is in suburban Sydney, has small class sizes, and is financially supported by a community that boasts it has no poverty. The sect's Victorian school, Glenvale, which has campuses at Glenroy, Lilydale and Melton, receives a lower rate of funding. [Source] Other more benign disparities include the YMCA securing Recreation Centre contracts, not due to service quality, but due to tax breaks. With the above financial favour, the YMCA simply undercut non religious commercial entities, involved in the bidding for tendered contracts. In true religio-centric character the YMCA is one of a very few organisations to ignore qualifications and experience staff bring to public health and recreation needs. Pay, for example, is in the lowest income bracket for staff who have a fitness hobby certificate and those with science degrees and years of clinical experience. When we pay for "extra" services it's a mere marketing strategy we respond to. Ditto referrals from physiotherapists to community recreation centres. We have no idea if the individual provider at the YMCA is a professionally trained therapist or someone earning a few part time dollars. An identical national uniform serves to depersonalise the individual and add weight to the "team loyalty" con. Occasionally, this blinds the staff themselves. Many become convinced such poor income is "a necessary part of the job", focusing on free use of facilities and "community contribution" as their noble career path. Coerced philanthropy, perhaps? Join and we must pay by monthly or fortnightly direct debit. Stop attending and we alone must stop the debiting. In most cases it's the attrition of members that finances the centres. Fee paying members who don't attend always outnumber those who do. But that's fine as it is the accepted model in the health and fitness industry. Guilt and well meaning plans to "get fit" will ensure we do not cancel paying until long after we've stopped attending. And there's always the disincentive to stop paying in the huge joining fee we're continually reminded about. In fact, the YMCA go after profit like a struggling business. In an age of diseases related to lack of exercise, one may wonder why this Christian group is not feeling too charitable - despite massive financial help. A global organisation, the YMCA to probably afford to run our centres at no loss, as a favour to a sports keen nation. But such financial realities apply to all religious affiliates - great and small. It's always been about the money. Nothing but the money. Staff, clients and the Great Aussie Fair Go are used or abused to advantage in keeping ahead, as it were. For a mere fraction of the above, religions in Australia, Pell, Baptists, Brethren Elders, Cults, Catholics, business savvy Seventh Day Adventists, "Drug Free" Scientologists/Evangelists, Harley riding con artists, Christian City, Teen Challenge, greed focused magic working Pentecostals - and more - have much to smile about. This of course, is only topped by the rise of fundamentalism in all it's lethal malignant glory. And still, we keep on paying... All articles touched on and other posts are here. Comments[1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








